Scribe & Green on the BIG screen

There are far too many people out there writing “reviews of movie-films & articles about them with absolutely no clue what the hell they’re talking about." Here are 2 more of them! (Well, one of us knows what the h___ we're talking about, but we'll leave it up to you to decide who that is...) Ultimately, can two people as opposite as Scribe and Green agree on anything?? That's where the fun begins. Won't you join us? (Every now and then we'll add a guest review, just for kicks.)

Friday, October 24, 2008

All the President's Men

SCRIBE'S I NEVER THOUGHT I'D WISH FOR THE DAYS WHEN THIS GUY WAS PRESIDENT REVIEW:

What's left to be said about a classic motion picture and who is
arrogant enough to presume they are the ones to say it?

US!!! Two guys who barely remember this time and have no business discussing it, that's who!!!

Besides, I grew up in your typical Nixon-despising household and never knew anyone who felt differently until I was well into my thirties. To me, this was a film about someone everybody hated getting his comeuppance. Apparently not. There really were those who thought he was a good president on a righteous path.

Thank god for the media! (In those days) Washington post reporters Bob Woodward & Carl Bernstein wouldn't take no for an answer in their hard-hitting and long-running investigation of the Watergate break-in and wire tappings.

Nowadays neo-cons would probably see tapping the conversations of the competition during their convention as a sound business solution. But not only is it illegal, it is also sending the message that the president condones suppressing the rights of individuals who disagree with him. Aren't you glad that ugliness is behind us? Oh, right.

All the President's Men would be a cautionary tale if anyone had heeded the warning. As it currently stands, it is a well-acted and directed film with two legendary stars portraying real people in a compelling manner. The cast is top-notch for the time, for all time actually, and the story clips along rather nicely.

This is one of those films I like to watch to gain historical perspective. For instance, watching this, would you have ever thought that one day Bernstein would be the real investigative journalist exposing government corruption while Woodward became a moderate, president-blowing media whore? Well, OK, that second part probably so...JUST SEE THE DAMN THING!!!

****1/2 out of *****


GREEN‘S “I NEED TO KNOW WHAT YOU KNOW” REVIEW:

Bob Woodward. Carl Bernstein. Two intrepid and tenacious young reporters for the Washington Post crack the story of a lifetime that defined the early 1970’s and raised the bar for print reporters’ journalistic integrity while ruining many a political career in the process. Faced with silence, fear, lies, denials and denials of denials from people “in the know,“ Woodward (Robert Redford) and Bernstein (Dustin Hoffman) persist until they discover the truth about it’s widespread underlying conspiracy.

Watergate, one of the biggest political scandals and cover-ups in American political history takes center stage in this excellent and gripping true story nicely directed by Alan J. Pakula. Redford and Hoffman are very convincing as the crack reporters who broke this case wide open. The supporting cast is excellent, too. I thought the movie dragged in places with its lengthy 139 minute run time but still found the story and characters compelling.

I'm always amazed at the 1970's hairstyles, or lack thereof. It amuses me to see the mop that passes for hair on Hoffman's head. Did Carl Bernstein really wear his hair that messy?

The most impressionable thing I remember most about Watergate was my mom’s monopolizing the television to watch the lousy Congressional hearings when I, as a selfish young pre-kindergarten lad, just wanted to watch cartoons. Sadly, I must admit that both of my parents admit to voting for Tricky Dick. Twice.

I majored in Communications in college and once harbored dreams of being a reporter some day, so I found this film's look inside a modern (albeit for the 1970’s) newspaper office to be fascinating and most informative.

Overall, I think the script was adapted well from Woodward and Bernstein‘s book, on which the film is based. An excellent film to watch if ever you get the chance.


**** out of *****

Labels:

3 Comments:

At 27 October, 2008 03:03 , Blogger American Guy said...

greeny - your reviews still sound like they come straight from the dust jacket or a trailer.

"Two intrepid and tenacious young reporters for the Washington Post crack the story of a lifetime..."

see, i can even hear that voiceover guy that recently died intoning those lines.

Your take on the hair and your mumwatching the hearings are much more intersting than reminding us that watergate was a big scandal.

in other news, your word verification thingy is urnad. I'm sure there's a joke or two in there. (that's your cue scribe)

Give us more you and less boilerplate.

 
At 27 October, 2008 17:21 , Blogger Tim said...

the whole idea behind the movie recap part of my review is to give a flavor about what the movie is about without giving away the whole film, so that you'll actually go out and watch the movie for yourself. Some films it is easier to do this for, others not so much.

I will admit I struggled with this review, as I seem to do moreso with movies based on real life events.

When I first read your comment this morning, I was wondering what "mumwatching" was, thinking it was some kind of disease...then I remembered your penchant for being gramatically careless/ indifferent in your writing and knew what you were getting at

 
At 29 October, 2008 13:52 , Blogger scribe said...

Girls, girls please!!!

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home