Scribe & Green on the BIG screen

There are far too many people out there writing “reviews of movie-films & articles about them with absolutely no clue what the hell they’re talking about." Here are 2 more of them! (Well, one of us knows what the h___ we're talking about, but we'll leave it up to you to decide who that is...) Ultimately, can two people as opposite as Scribe and Green agree on anything?? That's where the fun begins. Won't you join us? (Every now and then we'll add a guest review, just for kicks.)

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

Broken Flowers

Scribe's Review:

This movie is like having sex with a virgin: It starts off slowly and painful, there's lots of grumbling and pain, then suddenly you got full frontal nudity and things don't seem too bad!

Then she calls you the next day and you realize it isn't over.

In yet another moody, introspective Jim Jarmusch treatise on man's inner suffering, Bill Murray stars as an aging ladies man who suddenly receives a letter from an anonymous former conquest warning him of the possible arrival of an illegitimate son. With nothing to go on except a letter written with an old typewriter and a pink ribbon, he is coaxed into going on a ridiculous quest to locate the mother in question.

A thin plot, to be sure, and the first twenty minutes are filled with such dull, agonizing slowness that one almost feels that the movie has been placed on auto-pilot. Bill Murray is swiftly becoming the beleaguered, pathetic everyman in his new films and it is beyond annoying. How many times can this once active comic genius sit on his ass and stare at the camera in the name of "subtlety?" Apparently, at least one more since that's all he does until the middle portion of the film.

Jeffrey Wright is Murray's only friend in an atypically uninspired performance as a wanna-be detective. It is their unlikely bond that causes him to travel from chick to chick, searching for clues in the lamest and dullest way possible.

The films' conceit is its smug self-assured belief that it is presenting a minimalist, deeply philosophical commentary on regret and unhappiness. Films like this always wind up being more of a loosely bound collection of scenes than an actual narrative and this one is no exception.

Sadly, "Broken Flowers" only starts to become even remotely interesting at the very end of the film. But the left field ambiguousness of the so-called resolution just serves to remind the viewer of the overall pretentiousness of this poorly wrought effort by a hit and miss filmmaker.

Well, there is one other thing it serves to remind us of: Bill Murray is not only no longer cool, he is also little more than a pitiful shell of what he once was~


** out of ******

Green's Review:

Bill Murray stars as Don Johnston, an aging bachelor who was once the ladies man. Just as he's being dumped by his current fling, he receives this mysterious letter from a former girlfriend, hand addressed, typewritten on pink paper and mailed in a pink envelope. With no signature and a faded, unreadable postmark, the letter advises him that he has a 19 year old son, whom he didn't know about and has obviously never met. Due to the incessant badgering of his neighbor Winston, Don goes on a cross country quest to visit each of the four former girlfriends to see if they have any sons and to see if any of them will fess up. There are clues that each may be the one as there are subtle hints of pink at each woman's place. Not surprisingly, none of the four admit to writing the letter or having a son. Don never finds out who his son is or who the mother could be. When he gets back home, he sees a young boy on a "quest" and buys him a sandwich. They talk and Don, beginning to look hopeful, assumes this kid is his son. When confronted, the boy runs away. The movie ends with Don staring off in the street, dazed and confused as a car drives by with a boy in it who sort of resembles Don...

The DVD cover proclaims this to be a very funny film and one of Murray's best performances. I found it to be neither. The film is basically an exercise in uselessness and serves no purpose whatsoever. I like some sort of resolution to the films I watch and this movie provides none of that. The only conflict is his reluctance to go on the quest in mthe first place and his confrontations with each woman, none of which are overly compelling. The extremely talented Murray is horribly miscast in this role. The set of four widely different and extremely flaky women whom Murray's character seeks answers from provide the only semi-interesting point in the whole movie. Of the four, Sharon Stone's character was the one I liked best, primarily because she slept with him like no time had passed.

I had never heard of this film before we were prompted to review it and I can now see why. Do yourself a favor and avoid this film, unless you like to waste 106 minutes of time better spent watching a better movie.


*1/2 out of *****

Labels:

11 Comments:

At 01 August, 2007 21:41 , Blogger Tim said...

I forgot to mention the gratuitous full frontal teenage nudity for no apparent reason other than we needed to see some skin!!

Clearly that was the highlight of this film for me...

 
At 06 August, 2007 11:38 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

One comment and it's from my partner???

 
At 06 August, 2007 12:08 , Blogger Tim said...

yeah, pretty sad, huh?

You know how popular this film was when it came out and now that we've both given it smashed reviews everyone who hadn't sen it is gonna go right out and rent it.

Plus Bluez hasn't had internet access recently otherwise I'm sure she would have commented...

 
At 07 August, 2007 09:35 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

How ironic- we suffer through her crappy selection and she isn't there to reap the fruits of her labor.

 
At 07 August, 2007 12:56 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok Ok, you guys just didn't get it and I'm surprised. green gives "you've got mail" 4 stars and hates this film? Scribe, you knew it was going to be a slow film, what you did miss was the point.
Something as tangible as satisfaction isn't in the cards for Don Johnston, the audience has no chance of getting such relief either. There is no perfect ending. There is no guarantee of redemption or even revelation. But when called upon to give advice to a boy who may or may not be his son, NOW Johnston has something to say. Murray isn't allowed to be conventionally funny. Instead, he gives a controlled, subtle performance that seems unique to this singular film. Murray doesn't project the non-stop hilarity seen in "Coffee and Cigarettes." Nor does he ooze the hip charm evident in Sofia Coppola's "Lost in Translation." Jarmusch and Murray have created a genuine portrait of a real person, an aging ladies man who is not discontented with his lot in life, but also not particularly happy. Typical of people my age, some day you'll both get it. :-)

 
At 07 August, 2007 13:21 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

bluez,

I take offense at your insistence that I "didn't get it." What you think I don't get is the part of the film that's such a no-brainer it isn't worth including in a review. We know satisfaction isn't in the cards for the Murray character but so what? is my response. Make me give a damn about the guy before you paint him as a tragedy that is worth my one hour and forty-five minutes.

I didn't expect Murray to be conventionally funny because I don't think he knows how to do it anymore. But you referenced his most pretentious films, all of which symbolize for me what a hack he has become.

Thi films lacks any of the irony or intelligence necessary to paint a true portrait of this most uninteresting man and his even duller quest. Not a new thing for Jarmusch, sadly.

 
At 07 August, 2007 13:48 , Blogger Tim said...

bluez: that's why I said that Bill Murray was miscast in this role. What made him great was his comedy was subtle and the actor himself exudes charm, which heightens the comedy. If you wanted a serious actor, you could have chosen from at least a dozen other candidates.

This role for Murray is like putting a marlin into a goldfish bowl. Not only does the marlin die from lack of salt water but the bowl is way too small....

"..who is not discontented with his lot in life, but also not particularly happy."

To me this is like installing a screen door in a submarine. Not being happy with your life is equal to being discontent with it. There's no getting around it as far as I can see.

And the promise of resolution is alluded to by him receiving the letter in the first place. Why would the mother write it if not to get some resolution? If not for Murray's character but then for the sake of her son - so he has an opportunity to know who his father is. Don't you think the mother, after spending the effort to write the letter and send it would own up to it, when he shows up at the door? It's purpose was to call Murray's character into action was it not?

If there were resolution at the end, then the journey wouldn't have been so painful to watch.

You are right. I just don't get it.

 
At 07 August, 2007 18:57 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is a story about life and should be understood by people who live life, not just people who want to be entertained. You can't say Don Johnston started out making amends; his personal agenda in taking the journey dominates. But by the end of the movie he certainly has a change of view, and an awakening, which made it all the more poignant and real beyond most movies that are out there. Maybe only folks who have been through similar, get it, I don't know, but it is definitely worth thinking about. Very moving, very dry humor - I don't think I will soon forget it.

Oh and I didn't mean for you to take offense scribe...

 
At 08 August, 2007 13:40 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

Too late!

I quit!

 
At 08 August, 2007 19:46 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok I'll chill on the indie films! I promise!

 
At 09 August, 2007 13:25 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

If you do that, what will bring green and I closer to that eventual kiss moment?

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home